{"id":320,"date":"2026-10-12T19:04:42","date_gmt":"2026-10-12T17:04:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stockgeniuses.com\/blog\/?p=320"},"modified":"2026-10-12T19:04:44","modified_gmt":"2026-10-12T17:04:44","slug":"operating-cash-flow-formula","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stockgeniuses.com\/blog\/operating-cash-flow-formula\/","title":{"rendered":"Operating Cash Flow Formula: Calculation and Worked Example"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The operating cash flow formula under the indirect method starts with net income and adjusts it for noncash items, items whose cash effects belong outside operations, and changes in operating assets and liabilities. The result should reconcile to the company&#8217;s reported cash from operating activities for the same period. Operating cash flow is also called cash flow from operations, often shortened to OCF or CFO.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In practical terms:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Operating cash flow = Net income + Signed reconciliation adjustments<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A reconciliation is a calculation that explains how one reported amount connects to another. Here, it connects accounting profit to operating cash.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The important word is <em>signed<\/em>. Some adjustments increase the total; others reduce it. Memorizing an equation is less useful than knowing which entries belong in it and whether the company has already shown their cash-flow direction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Below, we reproduce Apple&#8217;s operating cash flow from every operating row in its financial statements. The example also shows why a quick calculation using profit and depreciation can miss the reported result.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Use the formula as a reconciliation, not a shortcut<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">You will often see a shorter version:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Operating cash flow = Net income + Noncash adjustments &#8211; Increase in net operating working capital<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here, net operating working capital means the relevant operating current assets less operating current liabilities, not every current balance-sheet account. In the simple case, an increase ties up cash and a decrease releases it, subject to any other reconciling effects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is useful shorthand when those categories capture all the relevant adjustments. It is not permission to ignore the rest of a company&#8217;s operating section. Real statements may include deferred taxes, gains and losses, and changes in non-current operating assets or liabilities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For a public-company calculation, the safest starting point is therefore the actual reconciliation. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sec.gov\/about\/reports-publications\/investorpubsbegfinstmtguide\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">SEC&#8217;s financial-statement guide<\/a> explains the basic bridge: adjust net income for noncash items and cash effects associated with operating assets and liabilities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Net income and operating cash flow answer different questions. Net income reflects recognized income and expenses under accounting rules. Operating cash flow measures the net cash generated or used by activities classified as operating during the period. Neither is the company&#8217;s ending bank balance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you need the wider statement&#8217;s layout first, start with <a href=\"\/blog\/how-to-read-a-cash-flow-statement\/\">how to read a cash flow statement<\/a>. Here the task is narrower: reproduce the operating total and understand the adjustments that get you there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There is also a difference between reconstructing a published calculation and preparing a statement from underlying accounting records. An investor can usually verify a reported reconciliation from its disclosed rows. Preparing it from scratch may require transaction details, acquisition information and other notes that two balance sheets alone do not provide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Get the adjustment direction right<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The indirect method begins with profit that has already included expenses and income. Adjustments undo or account for differences between that profit and operating cash. They are not a second set of sales and expenses to recognize.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Depreciation and amortization are familiar examples. They allocate asset costs to earnings over time without representing an equivalent current-period cash payment. Adding them back removes that noncash expense from the starting profit. It does not mean the assets were free or that depreciation generated cash.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Adjustments are not all positive. If an asset-sale gain is included in net income but the sale proceeds belong in investing activities, remove the gain from the operating reconciliation. Reverse the gain, not the full cash proceeds. A list of add-backs alone therefore cannot describe every adjustment needed to reach operating cash flow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The direction of an operating-balance adjustment follows a different question: how did collection or payment timing affect cash relative to recognized activity? Receivables are amounts owed to the business; payables are amounts it owes. Inventory consists of goods and materials held for sale or production. This guide shows the basic logic, assuming no other reconciling effects:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Movement in an operating balance<\/th><th>Usual adjustment to net income<\/th><th>Reason<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Receivables increase<\/td><td>Subtract<\/td><td>More recognized amounts remain uncollected<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Receivables decrease<\/td><td>Add<\/td><td>Collections can include amounts recognized earlier<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Inventory increases<\/td><td>Subtract<\/td><td>More resources are held in inventory, with supplier-payment effects considered separately<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Inventory decreases<\/td><td>Add<\/td><td>Less remains tied up in inventory, subject to other adjustments<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Operating payables increase<\/td><td>Add<\/td><td>Recognized obligations have not yet required equivalent cash payment<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Operating payables decrease<\/td><td>Subtract<\/td><td>Payments can settle obligations recognized earlier<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The reverse movements reverse the basic effect. <a href=\"https:\/\/openstax.org\/books\/principles-financial-accounting\/pages\/16-3-prepare-the-statement-of-cash-flows-using-the-indirect-method\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">OpenStax&#8217;s indirect-method explanation<\/a> provides further background on these operating adjustments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Do not apply this guide to every asset or liability. Cash, borrowings and investment holdings are not interchangeable with operating receivables, inventory and supplier balances. Nor should you automatically substitute the change in total current assets minus total current liabilities for the required operating adjustments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Most importantly, distinguish <strong>a balance movement<\/strong> from <strong>an already signed cash-flow entry<\/strong>. When a cash-flow statement shows an inventory adjustment in parentheses, the negative direction has already been supplied. Enter it once as negative. Applying another minus sign would reverse it incorrectly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Calculate Apple&#8217;s operating cash flow, line by line<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Example checked October 11, 2026.<\/strong> We use Apple&#8217;s <strong>nine months ended June 27, 2026<\/strong>, from its <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sec.gov\/Archives\/edgar\/data\/320193\/000032019326000020\/aapl-20260627.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Q3 FY2026 Form 10-Q<\/a>. The operating rows agree with the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.apple.com\/newsroom\/pdfs\/fy2026q3\/FY26_Q3_Consolidated_Financial_Statements.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">official financial tables accompanying its results release<\/a>. These interim statements are labeled <strong>unaudited<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">All amounts in the table are <strong>US$ millions<\/strong>. Parentheses mean negative amounts. The running-total column is our calculation, not a series of additional subtotals reported by Apple.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Operating reconciliation entry<\/th><th>Signed amount<\/th><th>Running total<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Net income<\/td><td>101,464<\/td><td>101,464<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Depreciation and amortization<\/td><td>9,973<\/td><td>111,437<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Share-based compensation expense<\/td><td>10,523<\/td><td>121,960<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Other<\/td><td>(2,037)<\/td><td>119,923<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Accounts receivable, net<\/td><td>8,316<\/td><td>128,239<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Vendor non-trade receivables<\/td><td>5,671<\/td><td>133,910<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Inventories<\/td><td>(5,461)<\/td><td>128,449<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Other current and non-current assets<\/td><td>(16,266)<\/td><td>112,183<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Accounts payable<\/td><td>(5,203)<\/td><td>106,980<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Other current and non-current liabilities<\/td><td>10,016<\/td><td>116,996<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The complete calculation is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>101,464 + 9,973 + 10,523 &#8211; 2,037 + 8,316 + 5,671 &#8211; 5,461 &#8211; 16,266 &#8211; 5,203 + 10,016 = 116,996<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That matches Apple&#8217;s reported cash generated by operating activities: <strong>$116.996 billion<\/strong> for the nine-month period. This is not cash flow for the June quarter alone, and it is not a full fiscal year&#8217;s result.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Notice what is absent from this calculation: capital expenditures, dividends, share repurchases and debt principal movements. Those do not belong in this company&#8217;s operating reconciliation. Adding them would answer a different cash-flow question.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Start with the matching profit figure<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Apple&#8217;s starting net income is <strong>$101.464 billion<\/strong> for the same nine months. Do not use the three-month profit from an adjacent income-statement column, an earnings-per-share figure, or a management-adjusted profit measure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is where the <a href=\"\/blog\/income-statement-vs-balance-sheet\/\">income statement versus balance sheet<\/a> distinction becomes practical. The starting profit covers a period. An ending receivables balance is a position at a date. Neither can replace the other&#8217;s role in the calculation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For another company, also check the reporting group. A consolidated cash-flow statement needs a starting profit figure consistent with that consolidated reconciliation. A similarly named amount attributable to a narrower ownership group may not be the correct starting line.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Preserve the adjustments before operating-balance changes<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Apple lists depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation expense, and an aggregate Other adjustment before its operating asset and liability changes. Together, those entries contribute:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>9,973 + 10,523 &#8211; 2,037 = 18,459 million<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That brings the running total to <strong>119,923 million<\/strong>. It is an intermediate calculation, not the final operating cash flow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Two cautions matter here. Share-based compensation is added back in this cash reconciliation, but compensation paid in equity can still have an economic cost to shareholders. Cash-flow presentation does not settle dilution or valuation questions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Also, retain the label Other unless you have evidence for a more detailed breakdown. A negative aggregate adjustment should not be rewritten as depreciation, a tax payment or a single investment gain merely to make the explanation sound more complete. Accurate limits are better than invented precision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Include every operating asset and liability adjustment<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The remaining six adjustments sum to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>8,316 + 5,671 &#8211; 5,461 &#8211; 16,266 &#8211; 5,203 + 10,016 = -2,927 million<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Together they reduce the intermediate total, giving:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>101,464 + 18,459 &#8211; 2,927 = 116,996 million<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Do not label that entire second group current working capital. Apple&#8217;s captions explicitly include both current and non-current assets and liabilities. The broader wording matters when checking a formula that mentions only short-term balances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Vendor non-trade receivables also deserve their own label. Apple&#8217;s filing explains that these arise from component sales to manufacturing vendors, and that those component sales are not recorded as products net sales. Treating the adjustment as ordinary customer collections would blur a real business distinction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The calculation now explains the <strong>$15.532 billion<\/strong> difference between net income and operating cash flow. It does not explain the gap entirely as depreciation, and it does not establish that every favorable adjustment will recur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">When your answer does not match the statement<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A mismatch is a reason to inspect the inputs, not to add an unexplained balancing number. Work through the likely causes in a deliberate order.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>First, check the period and units.<\/strong> An earnings release can place quarterly and year-to-date income figures side by side while presenting cash flow cumulatively. Use the period printed above the cash-flow column. Keep all calculations in the source units, then convert the final display if necessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Second, check signs and completeness.<\/strong> Count every operating row once, including negative Other entries and changes in non-current operating accounts. Do not add the reported operating total as another input. In a spreadsheet, sum only the starting profit and adjustments; compare the result with the reported subtotal in a separate check cell. Check individual rows even when the totals match: an omitted positive adjustment and an omitted negative adjustment could cancel each other out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Third, check whether you replaced reported adjustments with raw balance differences.<\/strong> Apple&#8217;s net accounts receivable fell from <strong>39,777 million<\/strong> to <strong>31,398 million<\/strong> between the relevant balance-sheet dates. The simple decrease is <strong>8,379 million<\/strong>, but the operating cash-flow adjustment is <strong>8,316 million<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The two amounts differ by <strong>63 million<\/strong>. That is enough to demonstrate why the balance-sheet subtraction is not an automatic substitute. It does not identify the cause of the difference. Foreign-exchange effects, acquisitions and noncash changes are possible reasons balances and cash-flow adjustments can diverge generally; none should be assigned to this specific residual without supporting evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For reproducing the published calculation, use the disclosed cash-flow adjustment. For understanding the difference itself, investigate the notes and account reconciliation. These are related but separate tasks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Fourth, check for double-counted cash disclosures.<\/strong> Apple&#8217;s supplemental disclosure shows <strong>26,555 million<\/strong> of cash paid for income taxes, net. That is not an extra line to subtract after you have already summed the complete operating reconciliation. A supplemental cash-payment disclosure helps explain cash activity; it is not automatically an additional adjustment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Finally, keep estimates separate from reported amounts.<\/strong> A data provider may normalize labels, use a trailing period or present values rounded differently. Resolve those differences before comparing its number with a filing. Do not silently combine a provider&#8217;s estimate with company-reported inputs and call the result a reproduced statement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Other formulas may be answering another question<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The indirect method is not the only way to present operating cash flow. Under the direct method, the calculation is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Operating cash flow = Operating cash receipts &#8211; Operating cash payments<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ifrs.org\/issued-standards\/list-of-standards\/ias-7-statement-of-cash-flows\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IAS 7 overview<\/a> describes the distinction between direct presentation and indirect reconciliation. That is general method context, not a claim that Apple reports under IFRS. Classification policies still need to be checked for the company and reporting framework being analyzed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A direct-method calculation needs actual operating receipt and payment categories. It is not revenue minus accounting expenses with a different name. Do not infer a full direct-method schedule from selected indirect adjustments when the necessary cash detail is missing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another shortcut is net income plus depreciation and amortization. For Apple, that would produce <strong>111,437 million<\/strong>, leaving out the other adjustments needed to reach the reported total. It can be a partial bridge, but it is not the complete calculation here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Likewise, an EBIT-based or EBITDA-based cash estimate needs its own definition. EBIT means earnings before interest and taxes; EBITDA also excludes depreciation and amortization. Starting from a different profit subtotal changes which tax, interest, noncash and operating-balance adjustments are still required. A project-finance exercise and a filed corporate cash-flow statement may use similar words while measuring different things. Check the intended output before borrowing the formula.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Free cash flow is another separate measure. A common definition subtracts capital expenditure from operating cash flow, but definitions vary. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sec.gov\/rules-regulations\/staff-guidance\/corporation-finance-interpretations\/non-gaap-financial-measures\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">SEC&#8217;s guidance on free cash flow<\/a>, Question 102.07, emphasizes the need to explain the calculation. We are not calculating that measure here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Finally, operating cash flow is not the change in cash or the ending cash balance. Investing, financing and other reconciliation effects belong to the wider cash statement. A correct operating calculation should remain a clearly labeled component, not be promoted into a different total.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">A correct total still needs interpretation<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Matching the reported figure establishes that you have reproduced the disclosed arithmetic. It does not independently audit the accounts or prove that cash generation is sustainable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The composition deserves attention. Operating cash can benefit from collections of earlier receivables or changes in payment timing. Those effects have a different meaning from a durable improvement in the economics of selling products or services. An add-back can also be appropriate in the reconciliation while leaving a genuine economic cost elsewhere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For Apple, the table identifies exactly which adjustments increased or reduced the nine-month total. It does not establish management&#8217;s motives, the durability of each movement or a normal annual cash-generation level. Those questions require more periods, business context and the relevant disclosures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Avoid mechanically multiplying an interim result into a full-year forecast. Customer payments, inventory purchases and taxes need not be evenly distributed across the year. Comparison is more informative when the periods and definitions match.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nor does positive operating cash flow, by itself, establish that a business can comfortably meet every obligation. Investment requirements, debt maturities and available liquidity still matter. Broader <a href=\"\/blog\/financial-strength-and-risk-signals\/\">financial strength and risk signals<\/a> help frame those questions without turning one metric into a verdict.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Carry forward a number you can reproduce<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Before using operating cash flow in another ratio or model, retain four things: the source, reporting period, complete signed calculation and any unresolved interpretation issue. A number without those details is harder to verify when a new report arrives or a data provider changes its display.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">StockGeniuses&#8217; research notes and structured analysis support that distinction between an input and a conclusion. Recording the verified amount does not require treating it as a stock recommendation. It gives the next stage of research a traceable starting point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For this example, that starting point is <strong>116,996 million of operating cash flow for Apple&#8217;s nine months ended June 27, 2026<\/strong>, reproduced from the reported reconciliation. Within <a href=\"\/blog\/how-to-analyze-a-stock-systematically\/\">systematic stock analysis<\/a>, the next task is assessing what the components mean, not finding another shortcut that happens to produce an attractive number.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This article is educational and does not recommend buying or selling Apple or any other security.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The operating cash flow formula under the indirect method starts with net income and adjusts it for noncash items, items whose cash effects belong outside&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-320","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-analyze-a-stock"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stockgeniuses.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stockgeniuses.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stockgeniuses.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stockgeniuses.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stockgeniuses.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=320"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/stockgeniuses.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":321,"href":"https:\/\/stockgeniuses.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320\/revisions\/321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stockgeniuses.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stockgeniuses.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=320"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stockgeniuses.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}